There may be no hotter topic right now in the investment, business, and political world than ESG – the acronym which stands for environmental, social, and governance.
ESG is a framework used by investors and companies to evaluate the sustainability and ethical impact of an investment or business decision.
“ESG really went mainstream when the framework became an integral part of many institutional investors’ playbooks. There are a growing number of ESG rating agencies that assign ESG scores, as well as new and evolving reporting frameworks, all of which are improving the transparency and consistency of the ESG information that firms are reporting publicly (often called ESG disclosure),” explains the Corporate Financial Institute (CFI).
While topics such as socially responsible investing (SRI) and environmental, health, and safety (EHS) emerged in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, ESG is a fairly new player but currently, a Google search returns 469 million results for “ESG”, and a Google News search returns a whopping 37 million results.
And those numbers are likely to only go up as ESG is primed to be a talking point in the next presidential election.
Regardless of one’s thoughts of where ESG falls on the political spectrum, there is no denying that it has become a key consideration for investors, with many investment firms incorporating ESG factors into their investment decision-making process.
In addition, many companies, such as those in the manufacturing sector, have adopted ESG policies and practices to respond to growing investor and consumer demand for sustainable and socially responsible investments.
The concept of ESG has been around for several decades, but it has gained more prominence in recent years due to growing concerns about sustainability and social responsibility.
The origins of ESG can be traced back to the 1960s and 1970s when socially responsible investing (SRI) began to emerge.
SRI involves selecting investments based on both financial performance and social or environmental criteria. In the 1980s, SRI expanded to include a focus on corporate governance, which became known as socially responsible governance (SRG).
At the same time, environmental, health, and safety (EHS) was evolving in the 1990s into the “corporate sustainability” movement. By the early 2000s, the corporate sustainability movement became known as corporate social responsibility (CSR).
The seeds of today’s ESG were planted in January 2004 when former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan invited over 50 CEOs of major financial institutions to participate in a joint initiative with the UN Global Compact, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), and the Swiss government.
“The goal of the initiative was to find ways to integrate ESG into capital markets. A year later this initiative produced a report entitled “Who Cares Wins,” with Ivo Knoepfel as the author,” reports Georg Kell in Forbes. “The report made the case that embedding environmental, social and governance factors in capital markets makes good business sense and leads to more sustainable markets and better outcomes for societies.”
Kell says that at the same time, the UNEP Finance Initiative produced the “Freshfield Report” that showed that ESG issues are relevant for financial valuation.
The “Who Cares Wins” and “Freshfield Report” formed the nucleus for the launch of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) at the New York Stock Exchange in 2006 and the launch of the Sustainable Stock Exchange Initiative (SSEI) the following year.
ESG is the intersection of its three core principles: environmental, social, and governance.
ESG factors can be important because there is potential for a significant impact on the long-term performance and reputation of a company.
Many investors now incorporate ESG considerations into their investment decision-making process, and many companies have adopted ESG policies and practices in response to growing investor and consumer demand for sustainable and socially responsible investments.
The basics of the three ESG areas include:
“Environmental factors refer to an organization’s environmental impact(s) and risk management practices. These include direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, management’s stewardship over natural resources, and the firm’s overall resiliency against physical climate risks (like climate change, flooding, and fires),” says CFI.
“A hallmark of ESG is how social impact expectations have extended outside the walls of the company and to supply chain partners, particularly those in developing economies where environmental and labor standards may be less robust,” says CFI.
“ESG analysts will seek to understand better how leadership’s incentives are aligned with stakeholder expectations, how shareholder rights are viewed and honored, and what types of internal controls exist to promote transparency and accountability on the part of leadership,” says CFI.
“ESG factors cover a wide spectrum of issues that traditionally are not part of financial analysis yet may have financial relevance,” writes Kell. “This might include how corporations respond to climate change, how good they are with water management, how effective their health and safety policies are in the protection against accidents, how they manage their supply chains, how they treat their workers, and whether they have a corporate culture that builds trust and fosters innovation.
ESG factors are especially relevant to the manufacturing sector, given the sector's significant impact on the environment and society.
Environmental considerations for manufacturing companies may include:
Social considerations for manufacturing companies may include:
Governance considerations for manufacturing companies may include:
Acronyms will surely come and go in the coming years, but manufacturing companies will always need to account for environmental, social, and governance considerations in their operations, supply chain, and governance practices to ensure long-term sustainability and success.
The recommendation(s), advice and contents of this material are provided for informational purposes only and do not purport to address every possible legal obligation, hazard, code violation, loss potential or exception to good practice. Dean & Draper Insurance Agency specifically disclaims any warranty or representation that acceptance of any recommendations or advice contained herein will make any premises, property or operation safe or in compliance with any law or regulation. Under no circumstances should this material or your acceptance of any recommendations or advice contained herein be construed as establishing the existence or availability of any insurance coverage with Dean & Draper Insurance Agency. By providing this information to you, Dean & Draper Insurance Agency does not assume (and specifically disclaims) any duty, undertaking or responsibility to you. The decision to accept or implement any recommendation(s) or advice contained in this material must be made by you.